Opinions Archive
Results 1 - 10 of 1286
The Marketable Title Act, Minn. Stat. § 541.023 (2022), does not apply to land dedicated to public use by plat. Reversed and remanded.
Date:
March
29, 2023
1. Under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the plain meaning of the assault exception in Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 16 (2022), is that an act must be consciously and deliberately intended to injure the employee for personal reasons. 2. Under the assault exception in Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 16, the mental illness of an assailant does not prevent a compensation judge from determining that an assailant intended to injure an employee for personal reasons, which bars the victim employee from receiving workers’ compensation benefits. Affirmed.
Date:
March
29, 2023
The tax court did not clearly err by excluding the "concession fee" from rental income in the income-capitalization approach the court used to assess market value. Affirmed.
Date:
March
29, 2023
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS March 28, 2023 _____________________________________ In re Daniel Cragg, et al., Petitioners, Dalvin Cook, SPECIAL TERM ORDER 1 Respondent, A23-0309 vs. Gracelyn ...
Date:
March
28, 2023
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS _____________________________________ March 28, 2023 In re the Marriage of: Nicole Dolores Bengtson, petitioner, SPECIAL TERM ORDER 1 Respondent, A23-0328 ...
Date:
March
28, 2023
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS _____________________________________ March 28, 2023 In the Application of: Eric Sorenson for a change of legal name to Cherrity Honesty- Alexis Meranelli. ...
Date:
March
28, 2023
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS _____________________________________ March 28, 2023 In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia ...
Date:
March
28, 2023
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS March 28, 2023 _____________________________________ Chad D. Shilson, Respondent, SPECIAL TERM ORDER 1 vs. A23-0324 Rebecca Bragg, Appellant. _____________________________________ Considered and ...
Date:
March
28, 2023
A petition for an order declaring eligibility for compensation based on exoneration under Minn. Stat. § 590.11 (2022) is a postconviction proceeding for which no filing fee or order granting in forma pauperis status is required. Reversed and remanded.
Date:
March
27, 2023
Appellant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because (1) the district court abused its discretion by admitting relationship evidence pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 634.20 (2022), and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct by eliciting prejudicial testimony from witnesses and failing to prepare its witnesses. In the alternative, appellant asserts that the cumulative effect of these errors requires a new trial. Because the district court acted within its discretion by admitting relationship evidence and because the prosecutor did not commit misconduct, we affirm.
Date:
March
27, 2023