December 13, 2024 - The Department correctly determined that Appellants violated licensing requirements regarding discipline. Appellants did not prove that they complied with discipline requirements. The Department did not substantiate that Appellants did not provide for foster children’s basic needs and that age-appropriate activities, exercise, and recreation for the foster children was not provided. Given, however, the serious nature of the discipline violations, and because it is reasonably inferred that improper discipline was long-standing and routine, and because Appellants demonstrated they do not appreciate the nature of the improper discipline, the Department demonstrated reasonable cause for revocation of Appellants’ child foster care license. Therefore, the Judge recommends the Commissioner AFFIRM the revocation.