Accepting the facts alleged in the Complaint as true, the Administrative Law Judge finds that Complainant has set forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.02, on the part of Respondent. This claim will proceed to a probable cause hearing as indicated in this Order.

 

"> Accepting the facts alleged in the Complaint as true, the Administrative Law Judge finds that Complainant has set forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.02, on the part of Respondent. This claim will proceed to a probable cause hearing as indicated in this Order.

 

">
Primary navigation

Public & Media

    Administrative Law Archives

    This page contains all substantive, public administrative law decisions from the past seven years. To request a copy of an older decision, or a decision you believe should be public but cannot find on this page, please submit a data request. To view decisions regarding Municipal Boundary Adjustments, please visit the Boundary Adjustment Reporting System. 

    RSS feed
    22-0325-38562-Heather Paulsen, Complainant, vs. Eric Pratt for Minnesota Committee, Respondent. August 4, 2022- Accepting the facts alleged in the Complaint as true, the Administrative Law Judge finds that Complainant has set forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.02, on the part of Respondent. This claim will proceed to a probable cause hearing as indicated in this Order.

     

     Last Modified: 8/4/2022 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags:
    back to top