">  

">
Primary navigation

Public & Media

    Administrative Law Archives

    This page contains all substantive, public administrative law decisions from the past seven years. To request a copy of an older decision, or a decision you believe should be public but cannot find on this page, please submit a data request. To view decisions regarding Municipal Boundary Adjustments, please visit the Boundary Adjustment Reporting System. 

    RSS feed
    23-0325-38553- Don Bumgarner, Complainant, vs. Kau Guannu, Respondent. August 4, 2022- The campaign signs promote Respondent’s candidacy and were disseminated to influence voting. Therefore, the signs meet the definition of “campaign material” under Minn. Stat. § 211B.01, subd. 2. As campaign material, the signs must “prominently include” a disclaimer “substantially in the form” provided under Minn. Stat. § 211B.04, unless they meet an exception provided for in the statute.14
    According to the Complaint, Respondent’s campaign signs lack required campaign material disclaimers. Complainant has established prima facie violations of Minn. Stat. § 211B.04 by Respondent. Therefore, the claimed violation will proceed to a probable cause hearing as ordered above.
     

     

     Last Modified: 8/4/2022 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags:
    back to top