May 31, 2022- Based on a careful review of the record, the Administrative Law Judge concludes the Complaint Committee established it is entitled to summary disposition as a matter of law because Respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 326.02, subd. 1 and 3 by representing himself as a professional engineer while his license was expired. And that Respondent violated:
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 1(B), by failing to be truthful in all professional documents.
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 2, by making a false statement on an application for renewal; and
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 4(C), by engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation.
Consequently, the Administrative Law Judge respectfully recommends that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Disposition be denied, and the Board’s Motion for Summary Disposition be grant
">
May 31, 2022- Based on a careful review of the record, the Administrative Law Judge concludes the Complaint Committee established it is entitled to summary disposition as a matter of law because Respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 326.02, subd. 1 and 3 by representing himself as a professional engineer while his license was expired. And that Respondent violated:
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 1(B), by failing to be truthful in all professional documents.
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 2, by making a false statement on an application for renewal; and
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 4(C), by engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation.
Consequently, the Administrative Law Judge respectfully recommends that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Disposition be denied, and the Board’s Motion for Summary Disposition be grant
This page contains all substantive, public administrative law decisions from the past seven years. To request a copy of an older decision, or a decision you believe should be public but cannot find on this page, please submit a data request. To view decisions regarding Municipal Boundary Adjustments, please visit the Boundary Adjustment Reporting System.
1006-37594- In the Matter of the Professional Engineer License of Charles MarohnMay 31, 2022- Based on a careful review of the record, the Administrative Law Judge concludes the Complaint Committee established it is entitled to summary disposition as a matter of law because Respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 326.02, subd. 1 and 3 by representing himself as a professional engineer while his license was expired. And that Respondent violated:
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 1(B), by failing to be truthful in all professional documents.
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 2, by making a false statement on an application for renewal; and
• Minn. R. 1805.0200, subp. 4(C), by engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation.
Consequently, the Administrative Law Judge respectfully recommends that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Disposition be denied, and the Board’s Motion for Summary Disposition be grant
Last Modified: 5/31/2022 Size: 0Author: Categories: Tags:
