The Board has complied with all procedural requirements of rule and law. The Board also has the legal authority to adopt the proposed rules. The Board has established that the rules are needed, reasonable, and not substantially different from those noticed in the State Register. The Administrative Law Judge APPROVES the proposed rules, as written or modified by the Board in response to comments, with the exception of the following rules, which are DISAPPROVED:

2400.2703, subp. 3, item K (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 3, item N (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 7, item L (as modified by the Board, now re-lettered Item M)

2400.2703, subp. 7, Item M (as modified by the Board, now re-lettered Item N)

2400.2703, subp. 8

 

The Administrative Law Judge APPROVES the following proposed rules as to legality, but urges technical changes to the rules to provide clarity and consistency, and to better comply with existing law:

2400.2040, subp. xx and xx[1] (definitions of “public hearing” and “public meeting”)

2400.2040, subp. 24b

2400.2040, subp. 65a

2400.2703, subp. 1, item A

2400.2703, subp. 1, item B

2400.2703, subp. 3, items A through J (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 3, items L and M (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 5, item F

2400.2703, subp. 5, item G (as modified by the Board)

2400.2703, subp. 6, item A (as modified by the Board)

2400.2703, subp. 6, item B

2400.2703, subp. 7, items A through K (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 9


"> The Board has complied with all procedural requirements of rule and law. The Board also has the legal authority to adopt the proposed rules. The Board has established that the rules are needed, reasonable, and not substantially different from those noticed in the State Register. The Administrative Law Judge APPROVES the proposed rules, as written or modified by the Board in response to comments, with the exception of the following rules, which are DISAPPROVED:

2400.2703, subp. 3, item K (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 3, item N (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 7, item L (as modified by the Board, now re-lettered Item M)

2400.2703, subp. 7, Item M (as modified by the Board, now re-lettered Item N)

2400.2703, subp. 8

 

The Administrative Law Judge APPROVES the following proposed rules as to legality, but urges technical changes to the rules to provide clarity and consistency, and to better comply with existing law:

2400.2040, subp. xx and xx[1] (definitions of “public hearing” and “public meeting”)

2400.2040, subp. 24b

2400.2040, subp. 65a

2400.2703, subp. 1, item A

2400.2703, subp. 1, item B

2400.2703, subp. 3, items A through J (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 3, items L and M (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 5, item F

2400.2703, subp. 5, item G (as modified by the Board)

2400.2703, subp. 6, item A (as modified by the Board)

2400.2703, subp. 6, item B

2400.2703, subp. 7, items A through K (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

2400.2703, subp. 9


">
Primary navigation

Public & Media

    Administrative Law Archives

    This page contains all substantive, public administrative law decisions from the past seven years. To request a copy of an older decision, or a decision you believe should be public but cannot find on this page, please submit a data request. To view decisions regarding Municipal Boundary Adjustments, please visit the Boundary Adjustment Reporting System. 

    RSS feed
    9055-37789- In the Matter of the Proposed Rules of the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board Governing Capitol Area Commemorative Artwork, Minnesota Rules Chapter 2400

    May 18, 2022- 

    The Board has complied with all procedural requirements of rule and law. The Board also has the legal authority to adopt the proposed rules. The Board has established that the rules are needed, reasonable, and not substantially different from those noticed in the State Register. The Administrative Law Judge APPROVES the proposed rules, as written or modified by the Board in response to comments, with the exception of the following rules, which are DISAPPROVED:

    2400.2703, subp. 3, item K (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

    2400.2703, subp. 3, item N (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

    2400.2703, subp. 7, item L (as modified by the Board, now re-lettered Item M)

    2400.2703, subp. 7, Item M (as modified by the Board, now re-lettered Item N)

    2400.2703, subp. 8

     

    The Administrative Law Judge APPROVES the following proposed rules as to legality, but urges technical changes to the rules to provide clarity and consistency, and to better comply with existing law:

    2400.2040, subp. xx and xx[1] (definitions of “public hearing” and “public meeting”)

    2400.2040, subp. 24b

    2400.2040, subp. 65a

    2400.2703, subp. 1, item A

    2400.2703, subp. 1, item B

    2400.2703, subp. 3, items A through J (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

    2400.2703, subp. 3, items L and M (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

    2400.2703, subp. 5, item F

    2400.2703, subp. 5, item G (as modified by the Board)

    2400.2703, subp. 6, item A (as modified by the Board)

    2400.2703, subp. 6, item B

    2400.2703, subp. 7, items A through K (as modified by the Board and re-lettered)

    2400.2703, subp. 9


     Last Modified: 5/18/2022 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags:
    back to top