There are no material facts in dispute requiring an evidentiary hearing. Further, Petitioner presents no argument countering the ECRC’s legal basis for judgment as a matter of law. Based on the law and the facts, the ECRC’s Motion is GRANTED. Petitioner’s appeal of his risk level determination is DISMISSED, and the ECRC’s assignment of risk level 3 to Petitioner is AFFIRMED."> There are no material facts in dispute requiring an evidentiary hearing. Further, Petitioner presents no argument countering the ECRC’s legal basis for judgment as a matter of law. Based on the law and the facts, the ECRC’s Motion is GRANTED. Petitioner’s appeal of his risk level determination is DISMISSED, and the ECRC’s assignment of risk level 3 to Petitioner is AFFIRMED.">
Primary navigation

Lawyers & Litigants

  1. Home
  3. Lawyers & Litigants
  5. Administrative Law Resources
  7. Administrative Law Archives

Administrative Law Archives

This page contains all substantive, public administrative law decisions from the past seven years. To request a copy of an older decision, or a decision you believe should be public but cannot find on this page, please submit a data request. To view decisions regarding Municipal Boundary Adjustments, please visit the Boundary Adjustment Reporting System. 
RSS feed
1100-38200- In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of Daniel J. Lovell June 14, 2022- There are no material facts in dispute requiring an evidentiary hearing. Further, Petitioner presents no argument countering the ECRC’s legal basis for judgment as a matter of law. Based on the law and the facts, the ECRC’s Motion is GRANTED. Petitioner’s appeal of his risk level determination is DISMISSED, and the ECRC’s assignment of risk level 3 to Petitioner is AFFIRMED. Last Modified: 6/14/2022 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags:
back to top