1.               The claims that Mr. Kern violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.02 are DISMISSED.

2.               Mr. Toole’s claim, under Minn. Stat. § 211B.04, regarding an alleged failure to use the required disclaimer on campaign materials, will proceed to a probable cause hearing.

"> 1.               The claims that Mr. Kern violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.02 are DISMISSED.

2.               Mr. Toole’s claim, under Minn. Stat. § 211B.04, regarding an alleged failure to use the required disclaimer on campaign materials, will proceed to a probable cause hearing.

">
skip to content
Primary navigation

Lawyers & Litigants

Administrative Law Archives

This page contains all substantive, public administrative law decisions from the past seven years. To request a copy of an older decision, or a decision you believe should be public but cannot find on this page, please submit a data request. To view decisions regarding Municipal Boundary Adjustments, please visit the Boundary Adjustment Reporting System. 

8-0320-38554- Kenneth R. Toole, Complainant, v. Douglas Kern, Respondent. August 4, 2022- 

1.               The claims that Mr. Kern violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.02 are DISMISSED.

2.               Mr. Toole’s claim, under Minn. Stat. § 211B.04, regarding an alleged failure to use the required disclaimer on campaign materials, will proceed to a probable cause hearing.

Last Modified: 8/4/2022 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags:
back to top