AFSCME 65 petitioned the Bureau for clarification or amendment of an appropriate unit. The petition requested clarification of the public employee status of certain employees of Stearns County. The Bureau found that an employee would have been a public employee within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 179A.03, subd. 14, had he not separated employment with the Employer on October 30, 2020. The Bureau also determined another employee question was moot due to the accepting the full-time position with the employer on January 6, 2021. Additionally, it was decided that a group of individuals did not meet the definition of a public employee in the accordance with Minn. Stat. 179A.03, subd. 14.

"> AFSCME 65 petitioned the Bureau for clarification or amendment of an appropriate unit. The petition requested clarification of the public employee status of certain employees of Stearns County. The Bureau found that an employee would have been a public employee within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 179A.03, subd. 14, had he not separated employment with the Employer on October 30, 2020. The Bureau also determined another employee question was moot due to the accepting the full-time position with the employer on January 6, 2021. Additionally, it was decided that a group of individuals did not meet the definition of a public employee in the accordance with Minn. Stat. 179A.03, subd. 14.

">
Primary navigation

    Representation Decisions

    RSS feed
    BMS Case No. 21PCL1296
    Unit Clarification Issued August 11, 2021
     
    Stearns County, St. Cloud, Minnesota
    - and -
    American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 65, 
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
     

    AFSCME 65 petitioned the Bureau for clarification or amendment of an appropriate unit. The petition requested clarification of the public employee status of certain employees of Stearns County. The Bureau found that an employee would have been a public employee within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 179A.03, subd. 14, had he not separated employment with the Employer on October 30, 2020. The Bureau also determined another employee question was moot due to the accepting the full-time position with the employer on January 6, 2021. Additionally, it was decided that a group of individuals did not meet the definition of a public employee in the accordance with Minn. Stat. 179A.03, subd. 14.

     Last Modified: 11/10/2021 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags:
    back to top