Arbitrator Jeffrey W. Jacobs
Issue: Salary Schedule Implementation
Union grieved implementation of 2025 salary schedule, maintaining City did not apply both COLA and market increases, or drop bottom step, Result was EEs did not receive 3.25% market adjustment in addition to step and COLA. City argues same settlement agreed to with LELS, and Union is misinterpreting email communications.
Grievance Denied City did not agree to proposed language that would have resulted in 2 steps/market adjustment of 3.25%. Union made aware City desired to offer same COLA and salary schedule offer as LELS approved.
"> City of Sartell & Teamsters 320Arbitrator Jeffrey W. Jacobs
Issue: Salary Schedule Implementation
Union grieved implementation of 2025 salary schedule, maintaining City did not apply both COLA and market increases, or drop bottom step, Result was EEs did not receive 3.25% market adjustment in addition to step and COLA. City argues same settlement agreed to with LELS, and Union is misinterpreting email communications.
Grievance Denied City did not agree to proposed language that would have resulted in 2 steps/market adjustment of 3.25%. Union made aware City desired to offer same COLA and salary schedule offer as LELS approved.
"> skip to contentCity of Sartell & Teamsters 320
Arbitrator Jeffrey W. Jacobs
Issue: Salary Schedule Implementation
Union grieved implementation of 2025 salary schedule, maintaining City did not apply both COLA and market increases, or drop bottom step, Result was EEs did not receive 3.25% market adjustment in addition to step and COLA. City argues same settlement agreed to with LELS, and Union is misinterpreting email communications.
Grievance Denied City did not agree to proposed language that would have resulted in 2 steps/market adjustment of 3.25%. Union made aware City desired to offer same COLA and salary schedule offer as LELS approved.
Last Modified: 7/9/2025 Size: 0 Author: Categories: Tags: