skip to content
Primary navigation

Search Opinions

Browse Opinions by Date

Request an Opinion

Our Role

Help with searching

For a Topic Search use terms suggested on our Topics page. Please note that clicking the "Browse Topics" link on the Search Opinions tab will take you away from the search page to a different page, which will lose any existing search results or data that has been entered into search boxes. If you plan to search by topic, we recommend selecting your topic first, and complete any additional fields in the search form after that.

For a simple search, type a few words or a phrase in the Full Text search box, then hit Enter or click the Search button. Your search query can be a single word, multiple words separated by spaces, or it can use more advanced syntax described in the FAQ below. Try to use words that are likely to be unique to the content you're looking for.

Note: For best results when searching for a particular citation, spell out the section and subdivision. For example, “13.43, subdivision 4.”


About Search Results

The advisory opinion library currently includes:
  • Data practices advisory opinions issued by the Commissioner of Administration from 1993 to the present.
  • Open Meeting Law advisory opinions issued by the Commissioner of Administration from 2003 to the present.
The Commissioner's authority is found in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072. Opinions are nonbinding, but a court may give them deference in a court action. Parties to a court action that act in conformity with an advisory opinion are not liable for certain damages or attorneys fees.
A written, numbered, and published opinion issued by the attorney general shall take precedence over an advisory opinion issued by the Commissioner of Administration.
Results 1 - 10 of 34
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072 (2014). It is based on the facts and information ...
Description: A member of the public asked about a government contractor’s obligation to respond to a request for data the contractor maintained in connection with its work for a City. The contractor did not respond to the request. The Commissioner opined that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 11, and the clause in the contract, the contractor was subject to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, for purposes of data created and maintained under the contract. Because Chapter 13 required the contractor to respond to a data request in a prompt and reasonable amount of time, the contractor did not comply.
Category: Contracts/privatization, Response to data requests
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Response to data requests, Private party contracts with government (13.05, subd. 11; see also: Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 839 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 2013).), No response
Commissioner: Matthew Massman
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072 (2014). It is based on the facts and information ...
Description: A requester asked for access to copies of contracts and non-disclosure agreements for cell phone exploitation equipment. The entity said it could not redact the documents because they contained inextricably intertwined trade secret data (section 13.37, subdivision 1(b)), and “deliberative process/ investigative techniques” data (section 13.82, subdivision 25). Contracts and non-disclosure agreements contain standard clauses that are presumptively public. Accordingly, the entity must redact any data that are properly classified under sections 13.37 and/or 13.82, and release the remaining public data.
Category: Contracts/privatization, Law enforcement data, Trade secret
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Law enforcement data, Trade secret, Deliberative processes (13.82, subd. 25 / subd. 16), Contracts, Privatization, 13.03 subdivision 11, Classification generally
Commissioner: Matthew Massman Acting
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072 (2013). It is based on the facts and information ...
Description: A requester asked for all data submitted in response to RFPs for third party auditors to conduct, or help conduct certain audits, and all resulting contracts. The request was denied based on the entity’s conclusion that all of the data are not public data that “relate to an audit” under section 3.979, subdivision 3(a). Section 13.591, subdivision 3, generally classifies most of the data in question as public, once the selection/evaluation process is complete (except trade secrets), other than data “relating to an audit” under section 3.979, subdivision 3(a). *Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072, subdivision 2, “[t]he commissioner … shall indicate when the principles stated in an opinion are not intended to provide guidance to all similarly situated persons or government entities.” The Commissioner does not intend for this opinion to be generally applicable.
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, RFP (request for proposals/request for bids, Contracts are public, Office of the Legislative Auditor
Commissioner: Matthew Massman Acting
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Sauk Rapids comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it denied access to data provided to the City and/or the City’s contractor by a private company that the City then used to determine whether to provide financial assistance to the company?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Business data (13.591), Official records
Commissioner: Spencer Cronk
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did Johnson Controls, Inc. (JCI) comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it charged $3,900 for copies of government data related to a contract JCI has entered into with Independent School District 2142, St. Louis County? Did Johnson Controls, Inc. (JCI) comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its response to a request for access to government data related to a contract JCI has entered into with Independent School District 2142, St. Louis County?
Category: Contracts/privatization, Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Contracts/privatization, Contracts, Copy costs
Commissioner: Spencer Cronk
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did Johnson Controls, Inc. comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it denied access to data related to a contract JCI has entered into with Independent School District 2142, St. Louis County?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Official records
Commissioner: Ryan Church Acting
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Wayzata comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it charged $265 to copy approximately 61 pages from the approximately 473 pages that the requestor inspected?
Category: Contracts/privatization, Copy costs
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Copy costs, Copy costs, Electronically maintained data (See also: Electronic data), Copy inspection hybrid, Copy costs
Commissioner: Sheila M. Reger
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Fergus Falls comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 and Minnesota Statutes, section 15.17, in responding to a data request for data on individuals and corporations that have made contributions or pledges toward the Fergus Falls Community Arena and the amounts they have contributed or pledged?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Private party contracts with government (13.05, subd. 11; see also: Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 839 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 2013).), Official records, Obligation to maintain and preserve records, Privatization
Commissioner: Sheila M.Reger
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the Minnesota Department of Commerce maintains: the names of propane companies and their weekly residential propane prices for the heating seasons of 2003-2004 through the present obtained by the Department as part of a federal government survey?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Federal contracts data (13.35)
Commissioner: Sheila M. Reger
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Saint Paul comply with Chapter 13 in response to a March 27, 2009 (and subsequent), request for access to “all policies and procedures governing the duties of the St. Paul Intervention Project, Inc., to include all employee manuals and/or handbooks, volunteer manuals, training manuals, daily procedures, mission statements, and employee and volunteer rosters and records?”
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Private party contracts with government (13.05, subd. 11; see also: Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 839 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 2013).), Private party response to data requests
Commissioner: Sheila M. Reger
back to top