Results 1 - 10 of 34
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072 (2014). It is based on the facts and information ...
Description: A member of the public asked about a government contractor’s obligation to respond to a request
for data the contractor maintained in connection with its work for a City. The contractor did not respond to the
request. The Commissioner opined that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 11, and the
clause in the contract, the contractor was subject to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, for purposes of data created
and maintained under the contract. Because Chapter 13 required the contractor to respond to a data request in a
prompt and reasonable amount of time, the contractor did not comply.
Category: Contracts/privatization, Response to data requests
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Response to data requests, Private party contracts with government (13.05, subd. 11; see also: Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 839 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 2013).), No response
Commissioner: Matthew Massman
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072 (2014). It is based on the facts and information ...
Description: A requester asked for access to copies
of contracts and non-disclosure agreements for cell
phone exploitation equipment. The entity said it could
not redact the documents because they contained
inextricably intertwined trade secret data (section
13.37, subdivision 1(b)), and “deliberative process/
investigative techniques” data (section 13.82,
subdivision 25). Contracts and non-disclosure
agreements contain standard clauses that are
presumptively public. Accordingly, the entity must
redact any data that are properly classified under
sections 13.37 and/or 13.82, and release the remaining
public data.
Category: Contracts/privatization, Law enforcement data, Trade secret
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Law enforcement data, Trade secret, Deliberative processes (13.82, subd. 25 / subd. 16), Contracts, Privatization, 13.03 subdivision 11, Classification generally
Commissioner: Matthew Massman Acting
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072 (2013). It is based on the facts and information ...
Description: A requester asked for all data
submitted in response to RFPs for third party
auditors to conduct, or help conduct certain audits,
and all resulting contracts. The request was denied
based on the entity’s conclusion that all of the data
are not public data that “relate to an audit” under
section 3.979, subdivision 3(a). Section 13.591,
subdivision 3, generally classifies most of the data
in question as public, once the selection/evaluation
process is complete (except trade secrets), other
than data “relating to an audit” under section
3.979, subdivision 3(a).
*Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.072,
subdivision 2, “[t]he commissioner … shall indicate
when the principles stated in an opinion are not
intended to provide guidance to all similarly situated
persons or government entities.” The Commissioner
does not intend for this opinion to be generally
applicable.
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, RFP (request for proposals/request for bids, Contracts are public, Office of the Legislative Auditor
Commissioner: Matthew Massman Acting
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Sauk Rapids comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it denied access to data provided to the City and/or the City’s contractor by a private company that the City then used to determine whether to provide financial assistance to the company?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Business data (13.591), Official records
Commissioner: Spencer Cronk
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did Johnson Controls, Inc. (JCI) comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it charged $3,900 for copies of government data related to a contract JCI has entered into with Independent School District 2142, St. Louis County?
Did Johnson Controls, Inc. (JCI) comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its response to a request for access to government data related to a contract JCI has entered into with Independent School District 2142, St. Louis County?
Category: Contracts/privatization, Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Contracts/privatization, Contracts, Copy costs
Commissioner: Spencer Cronk
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did Johnson Controls, Inc. comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it denied access to data related to a contract JCI has entered into with Independent School District 2142, St. Louis County?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Official records
Commissioner: Ryan Church Acting
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Wayzata comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it charged $265 to copy approximately 61 pages from the approximately 473 pages that the requestor inspected?
Category: Contracts/privatization, Copy costs
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Copy costs, Copy costs, Electronically maintained data (See also: Electronic data), Copy inspection hybrid, Copy costs
Commissioner: Sheila M. Reger
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Fergus Falls comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 and Minnesota Statutes, section 15.17, in responding to a data request for data on individuals and corporations that have made contributions or pledges toward the Fergus Falls Community Arena and the amounts they have contributed or pledged?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Private party contracts with government (13.05, subd. 11; see also: Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 839 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 2013).), Official records, Obligation to maintain and preserve records, Privatization
Commissioner: Sheila M.Reger
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the Minnesota Department of Commerce maintains: the names of propane companies and their weekly residential propane prices for the heating seasons of 2003-2004 through the present obtained by the Department as part of a federal government survey?
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Federal contracts data (13.35)
Commissioner: Sheila M. Reger
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data ...
Description: Did the City of Saint Paul comply with Chapter 13 in response to a March 27, 2009 (and subsequent), request for access to “all policies and procedures governing the duties of the St. Paul Intervention Project, Inc., to include all employee manuals and/or handbooks, volunteer manuals, training manuals, daily procedures, mission statements, and employee and volunteer rosters and records?”
Category: Contracts/privatization
Keywords: Contracts/privatization, Private party contracts with government (13.05, subd. 11; see also: Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 839 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 2013).), Private party response to data requests
Commissioner: Sheila M. Reger