may not be cited except as provided by
Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (1996).
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN COURT OF APPEALS
C4-96-1876
State of Minnesota,
Respondent,
vs.
Danny Robert Dunham, petitioner,
Appellant.
Filed February 11, 1997
Affirmed
Klaphake, Judge
Dakota County District Court
File No. K4-94-1168
Danny Robert Dunham, 1101 Linden Lane, Faribault, MN 55021-6400 (Appellant Pro Se)
Considered and decided by Amundson, Presiding Judge, Schumacher, Judge, and Klaphake, Judge.
Pro se appellant Danny Robert Dunham was convicted of four felony offenses stemming from breaking into his ex-wife's house and assaulting her on June 19, 1984. In this appeal, he challenges the court's imposition of a 96-month executed sentence and a $3,481 fine for the burglary conviction. Because the sentencing issues Dunham raises were or could have been raised in his previous postconviction appeal, we affirm.
Appellant also contends the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a fine of $3,481. Although this precise issue was not raised in appellant's first postconviction appeal, we conclude that it could have been raised in that appeal with the other sentencing issues. See Berg v. State, 403 N.W.2d 316, 318 (Minn. App. 1987) (court may decline to hear issues that could have been raised in previous postconviction appeal), review denied (Minn. May 18, 1987). We therefore decline to decide this issue.
Affirmed.