skip to content
Primary navigation

Complaint Process

The Board of Dentistry's mission is to ensure that Minnesota citizens receive quality dental care from competent dental health professionals. One of the ways the Board achieves this goal is by taking corrective or disciplinary action when the Minnesota Dental Practice Act (Minn. Statute 150A) has been violated by a dentist, dental hygienist or dental assistant.
Information regarding possible violations comes to the attention of the Board through written complaints. Complaints may be filed by anyone. Complaints are not public information and may not be discussed with anyone except the respondent (subject of the investigation) and the complainant. The Board is mandated to investigate all jurisdictional complaints against regulated individuals.

The Board of Dentistry Practitioner Review Committee

The Practitioner Review Committee is comprised of three current Board members: two dentists, one public member and one allied member. 

Protocol for Complaint Processing

1. Complaint Registration. When a potential complainant calls the office for information about filing a complaint, the Complaint Analyst mails a packet of information that includes a cover letter, a Complaint Registration form, an Authorization to Release Complaint form and a Records Waiver Authorization form.
2. Complaint File Set Up. When the complaint registration packet is returned to the Board office, the Complaint Analyst assigns a file number to it and the file is then assigned to the Practitioner Review Committee.
3. Investigation of Complaints. For most complaints, the analyst will obtain a written response from the dentist through a letter of inquiry. The purpose of a letter of inquiry is to obtain the licensees typewritten response to a given complaint and, along with all pertinent dental records.
Complaints alleging certain misconduct must, by law, be investigated by the Minnesota Attorney Generals Office (AGO). The Practitioner Review Committee may forward other complaints to the Attorney Generals Office. The purpose of an AGO investigation is to gather sufficient evidence from sources in addition to the licensee to either refute or confirm that a statute or rule has been violated, so that the Practitioner Review Committee can sufficiently establish the facts in a case.
Pursuant to Minn. Statute Chapter 214, complaints alleging the following types of misconduct must be forwarded to the Attorney Generals Office:
  • Any violation of chapter 609 (relates to criminal conviction);
  • Any conduct which would have to be reported under Minn. Statute 626.556 (relates to abuse of a minor or a vulnerable adult);
  • Any sexual contact or sexual conduct with a client;
  • Any violation of federal law;
  • Any actual or potential inability to practice the regulated profession or occupation by reason of illness, use of alcohol, drugs, chemicals or any other material, or as a result of any mental or physical condition;
  • Any violation of state medical assistance laws;
  • Any disciplinary action related to credentialing in another jurisdiction or county which was based on the same or related conduct specified in Minn. Statute 214.103, subdivision 8 ( see a-f ), above ).
4.Outside Consultant Reviews. The Practitioner Review Committee or the Attorney Generals Office may request that a consultant review the complaint material to determine if the dentists treatment met the minimum standard of care.

Types of Actions

1. Closure.

A complaint is closed when two or more Practitioner Review Committee members vote to close the matter after a review of the alleged violations and the licensees response to the allegations.
A response is obtained through a letter of inquiry and/or through an appearance before the Practitioner Review Committee. Based on a review of the information, the Committee may close the matter if it determines that disciplinary action or corrective action were not warranted in the matter.
In regard to alleged substandard dental treatment, the Committee may choose to close a complaint if they determine that the treatment did not constitute gross incompetence and/or repeated performance of substandard care (pursuant to the Minnesota Dental Practice Act).
The complaint and the licensees letter of response are retained in the Board's nonpublic files. If the Board receives additional complaints of a similar nature in the future, the Practitioner Review Committee may choose to reopen a closed complaint.
2. Agreement for Corrective Action.
Purpose: An Agreement for Corrective Action is used (1) to resolve complaints which allege minor violation(s) of the dental practice act, and (2) when the nature of the violation(s) does not warrant disciplinary action.
The Agreement for Corrective Action:
  1. An Agreement for Corrective Action is expected to lead to dismissal.
  2. It is not intended for long-term monitoring or conditions (whereas a Board order may place limits or conditions for long time periods);
  3. It is a public agreement, but it is not considered disciplinary action, and therefore, is not reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank.
  4. Agreement for Corrective Action's are public information, but are not published on the Board's website. These documents, however, are available upon request by contacting the Board office.
3. Disciplinary Order.
Purpose: A licensee is placed under the Board order to protect the public from mistreatment or misconduct by the individual and to hold the individual accountable for past actions.
The Stipulation and Order:
  1. When the Practitioner Review Committee finds the licensee in violation of the Dental Practice Act, it will ask the licensee to voluntarily enter into a Stipulation and Order to place conditions and/or limitations on their license.
  2. The Stipulation is an agreement between the licensee and the Practitioner Review Committee in which the licensee agrees that certain restrictions should be imposed on their license as a result of the committee having identified areas in which the individual violated the Dental Practice Act.
  3. The Order is issued by the full board when it has reviewed and ratified the Stipulation between the Practitioner Review Committee and the licensee. The Order implements the terms of the stipulation. The Stipulation and Order are incorporated into one written document.
  4. Should the licensee refuse to agree to stipulate to the conditions or limitations offered by the Practitioner Review Committee, or if the full Board rejects the proposed Stipulation and order, the matter may proceed to a contested case hearing initiated under the Administrative Procedures Act. The hearing is held before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and involves the presentation of testimony and submission of exhibits in a manner similar to a civil trial.
  • If the Practitioner Review Committee is successful at the contested case hearing the ALJ will indicate that the Boards position is correct and make a recommendation which will be limited to discipline or no discipline. After reviewing the ALJ report, the Board may issue a Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Order, which describes the disciplinary action taken against the licensee.
Types of disciplinary actions:
  • Conditional license. This permits the individual to continue to practice, but must meet certain conditions within a specified time period.
  • Limited / restricted license. This permits the individual to continue to practice, but only within well-defined parameters. Some orders allow for the limitation to be lifted once certain conditions are met.
  • Suspension. This requires the individual to cease all practice until the suspension is lifted.
[Note: If the Practitioner Review Committee determines that there is an imminent risk of harm to the public, they may act quickly to temporarily suspend a license. Within 10 days of the suspension, the Board will hold a hearing before its own members to determine whether the suspension should be continued, modified or lifted. Evidence may be presented by the Board or the licensee in affidavit form only. The licensee, or their counsel, may appear for oral argument. Within five working days of the hearing, the Board shall issue its order. If the suspension is continued, based on a finding that the licensee has violated the Dental Practice Act, the licensee is entitled to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge within 45 days of the issuance of the suspension order.]
  • Voluntary Surrender. This action is taken when an individual agrees to surrender their license as a resolution to violations found in their practice.
  • Revocation. This action results in the individuals license being annulled altogether. This is the most extreme disciplinary action that can be taken by the Board.
4. Dismissal. A complaint is dismissed when:
  • Two or more Practitioner Review Committee members decide a matter is non-jurisdictional.
  • Two or more Practitioner Review members have accepted the licensees completion of the requirements of his/her Agreement for Corrective Action.
  • The Board approves an Order for Unconditional License for the licensee who has completed the requirements of his/her disciplinary order.

Filling Out The Packet

The Minnesota Board of Dentistry does not accept anonymous complaints. When completing the forms, the Board asks that you provide your identity information. You have a choice about whether to allow us to release a copy of your actual complaint (see description below relating to the form titled, Authorization to Release Complaint).
Your identity will be kept confidential under Minnesota Statute 13.41, subd. 2. Once a complaint matter is resolved (through closure, taking corrective action or taking disciplinary action), the classification of the complaint and investigation information changes from confidential to private. You may call to speak with a Board Complaint Unit staff member if you would like to learn more about the classification of data maintained by the Board
There are rare instances when the Boards proposed resolution for a complaint matter is contested by the dental provider and your identity could be disclosed.
Please be aware that failing to provide the Board with identity information may result in the Board not being able to adequately investigate alleged violations. It also prohibits Board staff from providing you with updates regarding the Boards review and resolution of your complaint.

Form Information

Before completing these forms, please understand that the Board of Dentistry does not assist individuals in obtaining monetary refunds related to dental treatment. The Board of Dentistrys authority is limited to taking disciplinary or corrective action against a dental care provider when warranted in order to protect the public at large. If you are seeking monetary reimbursement, please call the Board office (612-548-2124) for information about where you may seek such assistance.
1. Complaint Registration Form:
While we do not wish to unduly complicate the filing of complaints, we ask that you submit your complaint in writing so that it can be properly evaluated. Please provide as much detail as you can regarding all facts which relate to the complaint, including records which you may have or know about, and any attempts you may have already made to resolve your complaint with the provider. If you are unable to submit your complaint in writing, please call our office.
2. Authorization to Obtain Records: 
If your complaint alleges that the dental care provider improperly treated you in some way, it will probably be necessary for the Board to obtain your dental records so that your complaint can be properly evaluated. For this reason, we have included an Authorization to Obtain Records form for your signature. It is not legally necessary for you to sign this form; your complaint will be evaluated regardless of whether you sign. However, it may be easier for the Board to evaluate and resolve your complaint if you sign this authorization.
(If your complaint is for a minor or dependent, please complete and send us the Records Waiver Authorization for Dependent Form.)
3. Authorization to Release Complaint:
When we analyze your complaint, we will likely seek a response from the provider. When requesting the providers response, it could be helpful to share your complaint with the provider. For this reason, we have included an Authorization to Release Complaint form for your signature. This form would authorize us to mail a copy of your complaint to the provider when we request a response. It is not legally necessary for you to sign this form; your complaint will be evaluated regardless of whether you sign it. However, it may be easier for the Board to evaluate and resolve your complaint if you do sign it. If you choose not to sign the Authorization to Release Complaint form, and the complaint becomes part of an active investigation, the complaint is classified as confidential data in accordance with the Minnesota Data Practice Act.

Rights Under Data Practices Act

In accordance with the Minnesota Data Practice Act, information supplied to the Board as part of an active investigation is classified as confidential data. However, the complaint may be disclosed to the Board members assigned to this case, Board staff, consultants retained by the Board, the Attorney Generals Office, other licensing officials and, when necessary, the courts. In addition, even if you do not sign the Authorization to Release Complaint form, the substance of the complaint may be disclosed to the provider. Disciplinary actions taken by the Board are public, but they do NOT include specific patient names.
Finally, may we again remind you to sign and date the Complaint Registration form. Please return it and the authorizations, if appropriate, to the address noted above.
The entire complaint resolution process can be very lengthy, but you will be notified in writing about the Boards decision regarding the resolution of your complaint.
Thank you in advance for taking the time to file your complaint.

Additional Complaint Resources

If you would like to look into additional resources on your concern, outside of the Board complaint process, please review these additional resources:
Dentist/Dental Professional
1. Contact the dentist from whom (and/or the practice) where you received treatment, to express your concerns and interest in resolving the matter together.

State of Minnesota Resources
Minnesota Dental Association
       5.  MDA Peer Review 
If your dentist is a member of the Minnesota Dental Association (MDA), its Peer Review process is available to you.  Peer Review is a formal process that deals with disputes about clinical services provided.  Your complaint is reviewed, researched and resolved by a group of your dentist's peers.  For a referral to the Peer Review Committee in your area, call the MDA at (800) 950-3368.  Most Minnesota dentists (77%) are MDA members, and all members agree to abide by the decision of the Peer Review Committee.
back to top