Opinions Archive

 

 2014

Results 41 - 50  (253 total results)

  • 80-0325-31963 Mark Senn, Complainant, vs. Denny Laufenburger, Laufenburger for Mayor Committee, Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - After reviewing the complaint and attached exhibits, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge has determined that the complaint sets forth prima facie violations of Minn. Stat. §§ 211B.04, .13, but not of .08.
  • 82-0325-31965 Peter Adolphson, Complainant, vs. Dan Campion, Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - IT IS ORDERED: That the Complaint filed by Peter Adolphson against Dan Campion is DISMISSED.
  • 60-0325-31964 Michael J. Leonard, Complainant, vs. Andrew Aller, Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - After reviewing the complaint and attached exhibits, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge has determined that the Complaint sets forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.04. The complaint, however, fails to set forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.08.
  • 8-0325-3197 Brad Cedergren v. Jillian Hendrickson
    November 03, 2014 - IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Complaint filed by Brad Cedergren against Jillian Hendrickson is DISMISSED.
  • 60-0325-31944 Bill Braun, Complainant, vs. Wellington Management, Inc., Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. There is probable cause to believe that Respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.15, subd. 2, by contributing something of monetary value to candidates Christopher Burns and Julie Ohs when it allowed them to post their campaign signs on corporate property managed by Respondent. 2. This matter is referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for assignment to a panel of three Administrative Law Judges, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 211B.35. 3. Should the parties decide that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary and that this matter may be submitted to the assigned panel of judges based on this Order, the record created at the probable cause hearing, the file, and final written argument, they must notify the undersigned Administrative Law Judge by 4:30 p.m. on Monday, November 10, 2014. If both Parties do not agree to waive their right to an evidentiary hearing, this matter will be scheduled for an evidentiary hearing in the near future.
  • 8-0325-31959 Bill Braun v. City of Woodbury
    October 31, 2014 - IT IS ORDERED THAT: The complaint filed by Bill Braun against the City of Woodbury is DISMISSED.
  • 11-1900-31930 In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to Rules Governing High Pressure Piping, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 5230
    October 29, 2014 - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Additional Notice Plan is APPROVED. 2. The Dual Notice is APPROVED.
  • 60-0325-31944 Bill Braun, Complainant, vs. Wellington Management, Inc., Respondent.
    October 27, 2014 - After reviewing the Complaint and attached exhibits, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge has determined that the Complaint sets forth prima facie violations of Minn. Stat. § 211B.15, subd. 2, but fails to set forth prima facie violations of Minn. Stat. § 211B.15, subds. 7b, 11 and 13.
  • 80-1004-31333 In the Matter of the Second Order Disapproving Rate Filings Issued to Genworth Life Insurance Company on behalf of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut
    October 23, 2014 - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Department’s Request for Continuance is DENIED. 2. The date for service and filings of witness lists and exhibits is extended as follows: By 4:30 p.m. on November 7, 2014, the parties shall exchange and file with this Office their proposed pre-labeled exhibits, an index of the proposed exhibits, and their witness lists. See Minn. R. 1400.6950. The Company shall label its exhibits sequentially using numbers 1 through 199. The Department shall label their exhibits sequentially using numbers starting with 200. To the extent necessary, the parties may agree to a different numbering sequence to accommodate their exhibits. The parties shall cooperate to avoid duplicating one another’s exhibits. All pages of exhibits shall be Bates stamped for identification. To the extent possible, the parties shall enter into prehearing stipulations regarding the facts involved in the hearing and the foundation for anticipated exhibits. Any party objecting to the foundation for any written exhibit shall notify the offering party and the judge in writing at least two (2) working days prior to the hearing or the foundation objection is considered waived. 3. A hearing in this matter will be held at the Office of Administrative Hearings, 600 North Robert Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. The hearing is scheduled for three consecutive days, beginning on November 17, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. and continuing as needed on November 18 and 19, 2014. 4. All other relevant provisions in the First Prehearing Order remain in effect.
  • 68-0325-31872 Stephen Wunderlich, Complainant, vs. Joseph Walsh, Respondent.
    October 23, 2014 - The Respondent failed to demonstrate that Section 211B.04 is unconstitutional as applied to the facts of this case. In addition, the Complainant established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent failed to include a disclaimer on his campaign material substantially in the form required under Minn. Stat. § 211B.04(b). For this violation, the Panel concludes a civil penalty of $250 is appropriate.
Pages:  Previous  1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5  Next