Opinions Archive

 

November 2014

Results 21 - 25  (25 total results)

  • 80-0325-31963 Mark Senn, Complainant, vs. Denny Laufenburger, Laufenburger for Mayor Committee, Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - After reviewing the complaint and attached exhibits, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge has determined that the complaint sets forth prima facie violations of Minn. Stat. §§ 211B.04, .13, but not of .08.
  • 82-0325-31965 Peter Adolphson, Complainant, vs. Dan Campion, Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - IT IS ORDERED: That the Complaint filed by Peter Adolphson against Dan Campion is DISMISSED.
  • 60-0325-31964 Michael J. Leonard, Complainant, vs. Andrew Aller, Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - After reviewing the complaint and attached exhibits, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge has determined that the Complaint sets forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.04. The complaint, however, fails to set forth a prima facie violation of Minn. Stat. § 211B.08.
  • 8-0325-3197 Brad Cedergren v. Jillian Hendrickson
    November 03, 2014 - IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Complaint filed by Brad Cedergren against Jillian Hendrickson is DISMISSED.
  • 60-0325-31944 Bill Braun, Complainant, vs. Wellington Management, Inc., Respondent.
    November 03, 2014 - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. There is probable cause to believe that Respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.15, subd. 2, by contributing something of monetary value to candidates Christopher Burns and Julie Ohs when it allowed them to post their campaign signs on corporate property managed by Respondent. 2. This matter is referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for assignment to a panel of three Administrative Law Judges, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 211B.35. 3. Should the parties decide that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary and that this matter may be submitted to the assigned panel of judges based on this Order, the record created at the probable cause hearing, the file, and final written argument, they must notify the undersigned Administrative Law Judge by 4:30 p.m. on Monday, November 10, 2014. If both Parties do not agree to waive their right to an evidentiary hearing, this matter will be scheduled for an evidentiary hearing in the near future.
Pages:  Previous  1 - 2 - 3