Briefs filed in David Frank, Relator, vs. Heartland Automotive Services, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent.

Minnesota State Law Library

Ask a Law Librarian

Home Research Legal Topics Skills Center Services About Us

Minnesota Appellate Court Issues in Briefs

Shown here are the statements of the issues presented for review by the appellate courts in the briefs filed for this case. The entire brief set can be found at the State Law Library and other libraries around the state. See Minnesota Appellate Court Briefs Collection for more information.

CASE NAME:  David Frank, Relator, vs. Heartland Automotive Services, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent.
        Read the opinion in this case at A06-2217
        CITATION: 743 N.W.2d 626 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008)

Legal Issues in RESPONDENT-DEPARTMENT'S BRIEF AND APPENDIX:
  • Employees whose conduct shows a serious violation of the employer's reasonable expectations are disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. David Frank, the general manager of an auto service business, charged a customer for a service despite knowing that the service had not been completed and the customer should not be charged. Is Frank disqualified from receiving benefits?
  • Also filed: Appellant's Informal Brief


    Minnesota State Law Library: Issues in Briefs

    Please send suggestions to the Web Manager.